| Pages: [1] |
1. Ganking, Wardecs and High-sec Aggression - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Amyclas Amatin wrote: Sixx Spades wrote: You're about to get a whole lot of data. "TheMittani says Hi!" uh... thanks, goons. Send out those survey links for me, will ya? no prob guy, an all-all broadcast got you a whole lot more data.
- by Powers Sa - at 2013.04.11 07:09:00
|
2. Ganking, Wardecs and High-sec Aggression - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
FWIFF0 wrote: Shut up forever.
- by Powers Sa - at 2013.04.11 05:48:00
|
3. [Proposal] Sovereignty Revamp - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Reiisha wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: You've skipped both reasons why these structures exist - the main one being timezones. It's very difficult to have a 'fair' mechanic that ensures alliances can't lose their assets while they sleep, while at ...
- by Powers Sa - at 2013.01.03 17:13:00
|
4. An Exciting Thread About Starbases - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
But wait, poses need to cloak and have a jump drive. :V
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.09.05 01:49:00
|
5. [PROPOSAL] Bring back the vagabond frill - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
The vagabond looks great, what are you guys talking about?
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.07.16 01:14:00
|
6. [PROPOSAL] Bring back the vagabond frill - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Khanh'rhh wrote: Leave it gone, the ears were silly :/ Pinky Feldman wrote: Leave the frill out. When I get the spires back on my beloved Curse, the Mateary can get the frills back on their Vaga. I wholeheartedly approve of this change bec...
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.06.29 02:38:00
|
7. Find Permacloakys - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
You can always do what I do and hunt them down with a fleet of 60 dudes and decloak them when they AFK and leave their stream up.
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.04.19 04:48:00
|
8. [Proposal] Factional Warfare - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Susan Black wrote: Powers Sa wrote: A random internet commenter had a good idea. Turn the current static Bunkers into Nullsec-style Outposts, dockable only by the owning Militia. No need to lock off already-existing stations. This is a...
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.03.28 00:23:00
|
9. [Proposal] Factional Warfare - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Dirk Smacker wrote: Did the OP watch the FW presentation from Fanfest? Yes, the french dev was talking about ihubs which I am intimately familiar with when it comes 0.0 Dominion Sov warfare. The problem with ihubs is that the lowsec stations ...
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.03.27 23:34:00
|
10. [Proposal] Factional Warfare - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
None ofthe Above wrote: Wasn't the proposal meant to avoid that? It defuses the outrage currently in progress around the proposed lockouts. Yeah, actually.
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.03.27 23:05:00
|
11. [Proposal] Factional Warfare - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
A random internet commenter had a good idea. There is a better way for Factional Warfare to flip sov/ownership: Turn the current static Bunkers into Nullsec-style Outposts, dockable only by the owning Militia. No need to lock off already-existi...
- by Powers Sa - at 2012.03.27 22:13:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |